
There’s a pattern that shows up again and again in real stories shared online, especially when it comes to older adults involved in romance scams.
At some point, the family notices and tries to step in, hoping they can talk the person out of it. But the person they’re trying to protect becomes defensive, conversations quickly turn into arguments, and no amount of evidence seems to land. In some cases, the more the family insists, the more the person pulls away, sometimes even cutting off contact altogether.
Meanwhile, the situation continues to escalate. The amounts of money sent increase over time, along with the stories explaining why they still can’t meet, or the promises of finally being together “soon.” As the money grows, loans may be taken out, savings disappear, and in some cases even homes are put at risk—and still, they believe.
To better understand why this happens—and why logic so often fails—we spoke with Anca Ivu, clinical psychologist and cognitive behavioral psychotherapist, about what’s really going on in these situations, and what you can—and can’t—do next.
Key takeaways:
When people feel pressured, judged, or pushed to change their behavior, they can instinctively resist, even if the concern is valid. It’s a way of protecting their sense of independence and control. „In practice, that means something frustrating but very real: the stronger the pressure, the stronger the pushback. And instead of stepping back, the person may hold on even more tightly, sometimes doing the exact opposite of what you’re asking, just to feel that the decision is still theirs”, says Anca Ivu.
When someone you care about is being scammed, the instinct is to explain, to show proof, to make them see what feels obvious to you. But in situations like this, logic is rarely what changes someone’s mind.
When you tell someone “this is a scam,” they don’t just hear a warning. They may hear: you’re wrong, you can’t trust your own judgment, or even you’ve been fooled. For many people, especially older adults who value their independence, that can feel deeply threatening.
As the therapist explains:
“When people feel that their autonomy is being challenged, they can react by trying to regain control—even if that means holding on more strongly to the very thing that’s putting them at risk.”
This is why pushing harder often backfires. Instead of opening the conversation, it can close it.
From the outside, it can look like they’re defending a stranger. But from their perspective, the situation feels very different.
Romance scams start with attention—daily messages, emotional support, and a sense of connection that builds over time. For someone who may feel lonely, overlooked, or disconnected, that interaction can quickly become meaningful.
“These situations are not about a lack of intelligence, but about unmet emotional needs. As people age, their social circles often shrink, and the roles that once provided meaning and validation begin to fade. At the same time, they become more oriented toward relationships that offer emotional closeness and a sense of connection.”, says Anca Ivu.
Scammers understand this and they respond to it with consistency, attention, and validation.
That means that when you’re trying to take away the scam, it can feel like you’re taking away the only person who listens to them every day. And even with the best intentions, it doesn’t feel like protection—it feels like loss.
The longer the relationship continues, the more someone invests in it—emotionally, but often financially as well. What starts as small amounts of money can grow into larger transfers, loans, or significant sacrifices. At that point, admitting the truth isn’t just about recognizing a scam. It means facing everything that came with it: the time, the trust, the hope, and the money.
"Many people in these situations experience a strong sense of shame and self-blame, which can make it even harder to step back or ask for help.” explains the therapist.
For some, it can feel easier to continue the story than to confront the possibility that it wasn’t real.
Related:
Your Elderly Mom Sent Money to an Online Romance Scammer. What You Can Do Now
How to Stop Your Elderly Dad from Sending Money to an Online Girlfriend
When you’re watching someone you care about send money, defend a stranger, and ignore every warning sign, it’s completely natural to react strongly. But some of the most instinctive reactions can actually make things worse.
Understanding why this happens changes how you respond. And in many cases, avoiding the wrong approach is just as important as choosing the right one.
Here’s what to avoid:
Saying things like:
“This is obviously a scam”
“How can you not see it?”
“You’re being fooled”
might feel justified, but they often trigger the opposite of what you’re hoping for. Instead of opening the conversation, they can make the person feel judged or attacked—and shift their focus from listening to defending themselves.
It’s tempting to gather everything you can—articles, videos, screenshots, similar stories—and present it all at once, hoping something will finally click. But too much information, especially when it challenges something they’re emotionally invested in, can feel like pressure rather than support. When that happens, people don’t process more carefully—they shut down.
Pushing for immediate action—“block them now,” “stop sending money,” “end this today”—can backfire, even if you’re right. The stronger the pressure, the stronger the resistance. What feels like urgency to you can feel like loss of control to them.
Even subtle reactions—tone of voice, frustration, disbelief—can come across as judgment. If the person feels embarrassed or exposed, they’re much less likely to open up, reconsider, or admit that something might be wrong. Instead of creating space for reflection, shame often pushes people deeper into denial.
None of this means you shouldn’t speak up. It means that how you approach the conversation matters just as much as what you say.
Related: Financial future faking: How it puts couples at risk of scams
If logic doesn’t work, it doesn’t mean you’re powerless, you just have to change the approach. Here’s what tends to help more in these situations:
Before anything else, the person needs to feel that you’re with them, not trying to prove them wrong. That doesn’t mean you agree with what’s happening. It means you show that your intention is to understand, not to judge.
Simple things you can say:
“I’m not trying to prove you wrong. I just want to understand.”
“I know this matters to you.”
When the conversation feels safe, people are more likely to stay in it. When it feels like a confrontation, they’re more likely to shut down.
Leave the decision with them, while still opening the door to reflection. Instead of:
“You need to stop this”
Try:
“You decide. But can we look at a few things together?”
This keeps their autonomy intact while making space for doubt to appear.
Rather than presenting conclusions, guide them toward their own.
You can ask:
The goal is to slow things down and gently shift the way they’re looking at the situation. There’s a simple idea behind this: people believe what they conclude themselves.
That’s why it helps to normalize the situation and shift the focus away from “you made a mistake.”
You can say things like:
·“This happens to a lot of people”
·“These scams are designed to feel real”
When shame goes down, openness goes up. Without that, even the best arguments won’t land.
At the core of these scams is often something very real: a need for connection, attention, or simply feeling valued.
If that need remains unmet in real life, the scam continues to fill that space—no matter how many logical arguments you bring in. That’s why it helps to shift part of your focus, not just toward what they’re doing, but toward how they’re feeling.
This can be as simple as spending more time with them, checking in more often, and showing genuine interest in their emotional experience, not just the situation itself.
You can also ask gentle questions like:
·“What do you enjoy most about talking to them?”
·“How do you feel after your conversations?”
Sometimes, understanding what the relationship gives them is the first step toward helping them question it.
Even if they’re not ready to stop, you can still introduce small moments of reflection.
One way to do that is by agreeing on a simple step before any important decision. It doesn’t have to feel like a rule—just a shared habit that slows things down.
For example:
·“If you ever feel unsure, can you call me before sending anything?”
·“Let’s agree to check together before any big decision”
These small pauses can make a real difference. They reduce pressure in the moment and create space for more thoughtful choices.
Related: What to do if your child gets scammed online: A parent’s step-by-step guide
No matter how much you care, how much effort you put in, or how carefully you choose your words, you may not be able to stop it. You can support them, guide them, stay present—but the final choice is still theirs.
“We need to remember that we can only influence half of the relationship. We have no control over how the other person interprets our actions or how they choose to respond. Understanding this helps us adjust our expectations and reduces the pressure we place on ourselves to ‘save’ someone.”, explains therapist Anca Ivu.
What you can do is keep the connection open, reduce shame, and create safer conditions around them, so that if doubt appears, they still have somewhere to turn.
At the same time, it helps to think about practical ways to reduce other security risks around them. Tools like Bitdefender Family Plan can add an extra layer of safety by flagging suspicious links, blocking known scam attempts, and helping you keep an eye on potential risks across devices—without turning the situation into surveillance.
Find out more about how Bitdefender Family Plans can support your family’s digital safety.
Focus on keeping the conversation open rather than trying to win the argument. Avoid confrontation, ask calm questions, and show that you’re there to understand, not judge. In many cases, how you approach the situation matters more than the evidence you bring.
Because the situation isn’t just about facts. It’s often tied to emotional needs like connection, validation, and feeling seen. Admitting the truth can also trigger shame, which makes people more likely to deny or defend the situation instead of stepping back.
Not always. You can influence their decisions, but you can’t control them. What you can do is reduce pressure, stay involved, and create safer conditions for them to reflect and reconsider over time.
Avoid direct confrontation and judgment. Use open-ended questions, validate their feelings, and keep the focus on understanding rather than proving a point. The goal is to keep communication open, not to force a decision.
Start with calm, non-confrontational phrases that keep the conversation open, such as:
tags
Cristina Popov is a Denmark-based content creator and small business owner who has been writing for Bitdefender since 2017, making cybersecurity feel more human and less overwhelming.
View all posts