1 min read

UK"s interception regime violates human rights, European court rules

Luana PASCU

September 17, 2018

Ad One product to protect all your devices, without slowing them down.
Free 90-day trial
UK"s interception regime violates human rights, European court rules

British intelligence agency GCHQ was found guilty of violating the European Convention on Human Rights, the European court of human rights in Strasbourg said after analyzing the methods used to collect user data, including from communication service providers, and intelligence sharing with foreign governments.

GCHQ”s bulk data collection strategy was too aggressive and included no comprehensive data protection methods, the court ruled, following complaints by human rights activists and journalists. The complaints were raised “about three different surveillance regimes: (1) the bulk interception of communications; (2) intelligence sharing with foreign governments; and (3) the obtaining of communications data from communications service providers,” reads the press release.

The agency is responsible for national security and informs the armed forces and government about potential homeland security risks. The decision comes after Edward Snowden”s statements about government surveillance and data sharing policies.

The GCHQ is not the only agency to resort to bulk interception of communication; in June the European court of human rights also looked into Swedish legislation. However, in that case the court ruled all security measures had been considered and no violations occurred, as “the Swedish system provided adequate and sufficient guarantees against arbitrariness and the risk of abuse.”

The court didn”t overlook the fact that, secret surveillance is acceptable on grounds of detecting acts of terrorism, human trafficking, drug dealing and cybercrimes, as well as crimes against children, as tech innovation helps criminals communicate and conceal their operations.

“A State may operate a bulk interception regime if it considers that it is necessary in the interests of national security,” said the court.

 

tags


Author



Right now

Top posts

The Holiday Guide to Tech Support: Fixing the Family Computer

The Holiday Guide to Tech Support: Fixing the Family Computer

November 24, 2021

2 min read
Bitdefender Celebrates 20 Years of Cybersecurity Leadership

Bitdefender Celebrates 20 Years of Cybersecurity Leadership

November 04, 2021

3 min read
Bitdefender Study Reveals How Consumers Like (and Dislike) Managing Passwords

Bitdefender Study Reveals How Consumers Like (and Dislike) Managing Passwords

October 26, 2021

3 min read
What are drive-by download attacks and how do you prevent them?

What are drive-by download attacks and how do you prevent them?

October 25, 2021

2 min read
Criminals Can't Wait to Add Your IoT Device to Their DDoS Networks

Criminals Can't Wait to Add Your IoT Device to Their DDoS Networks

October 22, 2021

2 min read
Six in 10 Consumers Faced a Cyber Threat in 2021, New Bitdefender Study Reveals

Six in 10 Consumers Faced a Cyber Threat in 2021, New Bitdefender Study Reveals

October 20, 2021

3 min read

FOLLOW US ON

SOCIAL MEDIA


You might also like

Common Credentials Criminals Use in IoT Dictionary Attacks Revealed Common Credentials Criminals Use in IoT Dictionary Attacks Revealed
Silviu STAHIE

November 30, 2021

3 min read
Interpol Busts 1,000 Cyber Crooks and Recovers $27M in Massive Fraud Crackdown Interpol Busts 1,000 Cyber Crooks and Recovers $27M in Massive Fraud Crackdown
Filip TRUȚĂ

November 29, 2021

2 min read
Social media firms will be forced to unmask online trolls, says Australia Social media firms will be forced to unmask online trolls, says Australia
Graham CLULEY

November 29, 2021

2 min read